476

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

Katee Sackhoff in "Another Life" That is a Netflix sci-fi show well worth the view

477

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

They're setting the stage for Pike dying and this new Kirk taking over, and I do not like him, the show will be worse with him in it, Anson Mount is way better.

All things being equal, I would agree with you.
But... By the time they have the new show to air I'm hoping all things are NOT equal.  The studio has been taken over.  Kurtzman and the rest of his group are out as they're contracts are being renewed.  That is WHY no new shows are in development because they don't want his group being attached to them in any way or having any claim on residuals.  So nothing moves forward until they are out on their collective arses.

So even if the new Kirk hasn't been great with current scripts and current horrible directing I'm hoping a new reverence for the show might emerge and all characteristics from everyone's acting, to all the writing to all the directing will improve. 

Trekkers: Our hope is eternal.

478 (edited by piraterepublic 2026-08-30 23:51:24)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

proteinnerd wrote:
piraterepublic wrote:
proteinnerd wrote:
piraterepublic wrote:

why would you want actors today pretending to be the exact same characters from a show over 50 years ago?

Because they are playing the exact same character that was portrayed 50 years ago....congrats on the stupidest comment I've seen in about 3 years.

you must be the exact same person you were at 13. and no amount of time or experiences has changed you.
because that is what you are expecting of fictional characters in a prequel to TOS.

you should just stop watching anything made new at all..
because every show has CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT now.

except for Cartoons and DC comic book movies.

what a boring life to lead, nothing and no one ever changes

Ha ha ha, in universe we are talking about 1-2 years between where we are in SNW now (mid penultimate season) and the start of TOS. How many people fundamentally change in that short a timeframe..or do you think there is a 50 year gap between events in SNW and TOS, that is what your argument implies.


you tell me how much did people change before and after 9-11?
how much do people change after deployed to iraq?

how much do people change after a horrible car accident?
there are reports of crew jumping off the side of an aircraft carrier after only 8 months,
do you think they stared that way? or did they change?

how many episodes of start trek involve the crew almost dying or some even dying?

give your head a shake... even cartoons do not ignore effects of trauma in the last 20 years

pirates were the first democratic organizations in the new world
and the first organizations where women could lead men

479 (edited by paisley1 2026-09-03 22:32:56)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

SgtSaint wrote:

They're setting the stage for Pike dying and this new Kirk taking over, and I do not like him, the show will be worse with him in it, Anson Mount is way better.

All things being equal, I would agree with you.
But... By the time they have the new show to air I'm hoping all things are NOT equal.  The studio has been taken over.  Kurtzman and the rest of his group are out as they're contracts are being renewed.  That is WHY no new shows are in development because they don't want his group being attached to them in any way or having any claim on residuals.  So nothing moves forward until they are out on their collective arses.

So even if the new Kirk hasn't been great with current scripts and current horrible directing I'm hoping a new reverence for the show might emerge and all characteristics from everyone's acting, to all the writing to all the directing will improve. 

Trekkers: Our hope is eternal.

If they decide to let Alex Kurtzman's contract lapse, say their goodbye's, they should hire Terry Matalas to reboot the franchise.  Or Brannon Braga.  Then there is hope.  Given the damage done to trek, Terry would still have to retcon the sh!t out of it, and fire so many people, like he'd need a contract that allowed him to fire at will!  You're fired, and you're fired, and you're so fired!

Alex Kurtzman's contract is just on hold during the merger, so we'll see.  Hopefully David Ellison moves Paramount to Tennessee, and gets out of woke Hollywood, and takes Trek into a new long form cinematic universe that is finally on brand.  Wishes and dreams, like Firefly season 2.

480

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

paisley1 wrote:

  Wishes and dreams, like Firefly season 2.


they got it and so will you..
another cartoon series.

pirates were the first democratic organizations in the new world
and the first organizations where women could lead men

481 (edited by SgtSaint 2026-08-31 06:15:48)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

paisley1 wrote:

Hopefully David Ellison moves Paramount to Tennessee, and gets out of woke Hollywood, and takes Trek into a new long form cinematic universe that is finally on brand.  Wishes and dreams, like Firefly season 2.

Gawd that sounds nice.  I like that vision.  I'm not thrilled with Ellison's earlier public statement that it was "going to move further in the future than we've ever seen".  But I do like his statements about a new crew and not more prequels.  I mean, after all DS9 took that chance and was brave enough to be a Trek show that WASN'T about the USS Enterprise. That had never been done before in Trek: That was brave a.f. back then.  And we need that kind of spine in leadership once again. (and no that sh!t focusing on the Discovery or the Athena doesn't count as it was Hollywoke cr@p).  I mean an actual Trek series.

That said... I don't know how "Star Trek Year One" with the Enterprise commanded by Kirk comes in to play.  Hopefully it means 2 shows concurrently.  I'm pretty confident that it having a new name is to *legally* separate it from "Strange New Worlds" so there is no contractual connection to Kurzman.  Its all the same cast, a continuation of the story, re-use of the sets - but legally, its a new show.

482

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

paisley1 wrote:
SgtSaint wrote:

They're setting the stage for Pike dying and this new Kirk taking over, and I do not like him, the show will be worse with him in it, Anson Mount is way better.

All things being equal, I would agree with you.
But... By the time they have the new show to air I'm hoping all things are NOT equal.  The studio has been taken over.  Kurtzman and the rest of his group are out as they're contracts are being renewed.  That is WHY no new shows are in development because they don't want his group being attached to them in any way or having any claim on residuals.  So nothing moves forward until they are out on their collective arses.

So even if the new Kirk hasn't been great with current scripts and current horrible directing I'm hoping a new reverence for the show might emerge and all characteristics from everyone's acting, to all the writing to all the directing will improve. 

Trekkers: Our hope is eternal.

If they decide to let Alex Kurtzman's contract lapse, say their goodbye's, they should hire Terry Matalas to reboot the franchise.  Or Brannon Braga.  Then there is hope.  Given the damage done to trek, Terry would still have to ret-conn the sh!t out of it, and fire so many people, like he'd need a contract that allowed him to fire at will!  You're fired, and you're fired, and you're so fired!

Alex Kurtzman's contract is just on hold during the merger, so we'll see.  Hopefully David Ellison moves Paramount to Tennessee, and gets out of woke Hollywood, and takes Trek into a new long form cinematic universe that is finally on brand.  Wishes and dreams, like Firefly season 2.

It is not nice to tease us like that.

Bad SgtSaint bad. smile

483

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:

Bad SgtSaint bad. smile

Bad Saint: No ammo for you!

484

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

SgtSaint wrote:
inkblot wrote:

Bad SgtSaint bad. smile

Bad Saint: No ammo for you!

I know there is a joke in there somewhere, but I don't get it.

485

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:
SgtSaint wrote:
inkblot wrote:

Bad SgtSaint bad. smile

Bad Saint: No ammo for you!

I know there is a joke in there somewhere, but I don't get it.

Its a play on the old meme/cartoon... "Bad cop, no donut".  But I'm an avid shooting enthusiast so its "no ammo"

486

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

SgtSaint wrote:
inkblot wrote:
SgtSaint wrote:
inkblot wrote:

Bad SgtSaint bad. smile

Bad Saint: No ammo for you!

I know there is a joke in there somewhere, but I don't get it.

Its a play on the old meme/cartoon... "Bad cop, no donut".  But I'm an avid shooting enthusiast so its "no ammo"

Thank you for the explanation. But I have never seen that cartoon, and I do not understand some of the new memes. I am like a man out of time.

487

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

You speak for a lot of us Inkblot as I didn't understand it either.

488 (edited by SgtSaint 2026-09-02 06:41:22)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

Like anything, just a google away.  I'm 60 by the way, so in that same "S.S. Old Guy" boat with y'all.

But as it dates back at least as far as 1999 I didn't think it was that obscure. Its on everything from t-shirts to bumper stickers.  I guess I was wrong.

https://i.imgur.com/Rma4YE6.png

489 (edited by inkblot 2026-09-02 10:34:04)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

SgtSaint wrote:

Like anything, just a google away.  I'm 60 by the way, so in that same "S.S. Old Guy" boat with y'all.

But as it dates back at least as far as 1999 I didn't think it was that obscure. Its on everything from t-shirts to bumper stickers.  I guess I was wrong.

Don't have a social life, so I do not see a lot of T-shirts.

61, used to program computers via punch cards. And now with A.I. I have to double check anything Google tells me. Or add, as far as I know, to anything computer related that I learned about Computers, via google.

Would tear apart my pc or re-install windows 3-5 times a week. Stopped this when I hit 45+. Now when I drop stuff, I think about if I really need what I just dropped, or if I can afford to loose whatever.

Now I sprain my wrist opening the side panel. Still Run Windows 7, am afraid of new stuff. And my newest PC is 2006.

I am old enough to never do my banking on-line. No social media account etc. These idiots that video record their dirty deeds and then share via Tik Tok are strangers to me.

They were not kidding, when they said if you do not use it you will loose it. I may know a crap load more then my wife, about a PC, but a 12 year old knows way more about PC's and Os's and hardware then I do.

I hate growing old, and not having kept up. But PC's or computer electronics got way to expensive, to keep up with.
And you cannot keep up with stuff you cannot afford.

Just look at the old mechanics vs the new ones. Here is one of the regrets my father warned me about.

Cheers.

490 (edited by piraterepublic 2026-09-03 01:08:31)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

SgtSaint wrote:

Like anything, just a google away.  I'm 60 by the way, so in that same "S.S. Old Guy" boat with y'all.

But as it dates back at least as far as 1999 I didn't think it was that obscure. Its on everything from t-shirts to bumper stickers.  I guess I was wrong.

https://i.imgur.com/Rma4YE6.png

i have seen the quote ( as i know a number of leos)
seen it used in a number of situations
dogs, cops, junkies, wives, etcs
its not that obscure.
its just not memorable.

i saw it and did not think any higher the sgt--ammo link.

i prefer Cartman dressed as a cop , toilet paper hanging off the side with "respect authority" on it.

pirates were the first democratic organizations in the new world
and the first organizations where women could lead men

491 (edited by inkblot 2026-09-03 13:57:51)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

1999, Jesus son thats 27 years ago. And wth is a cartman?

Some kind of cartridge super hero?

Just watching the latest episode, I am only 4 minutes in and am loving this. Anson Mounts acting is superb. He really pulls it off. Cant wait to return with my thoughts on the rest of this episode.

Crap, just looked at the episode description, this will suck. They already had a trickster in one episode. WTH??

The cosmic trickster appears in Season 3, Episode 2, titled "Wedding Bell Blues".

It is unfortunate that Wilbur James Campbell, Jr. did not live past 2011, he would have been perfect to play the part.

Rhys Montague Darby really pulls it off in the looks department. Have to give him that.

As I am further in now, this episode does look very promising, I am glad I  was wrong smile.

U think I might be over analyzing this? I should simply enjoy it. Especially considering we are 1 episode away from the season finale. Crap 8 episodes really sux.

I really enjoyed this episode, it was soap opera over the top, and the actors played it well.

Spoiler

I really enjoyed Cybok. Kind of reminded me of Fabio.

1 more to go. Bummer.

492

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:

Especially considering we are 1 episode away from the season finale. Crap 8 episodes really sux.

I believe this season is 10 episodes.

Unfortunately I enjoyed maybe 2 episodes from season 4 so far hmm

493 (edited by inkblot 2026-09-03 19:33:21)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

Oh cool, you are right. Woohoo, we get 10. I could have  sworn it said 8 when I checked last time. Its still 10, way to short for the Flag ship of Science fiction.

And pretty much 2 episodes here as well. Might I ask which episodes MalaNoche?

494 (edited by piraterepublic 2026-09-03 15:48:33)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:

And wth is a cartman?

if you do not know the name "Cartman"

you must be living in a cave without a tv.
he has been on tv for more then 25 years


i am sure the actors LOVED making this episode.
but it is the lowest possible level of scifi.

right down there with the puppets episode.
and equal with musicals.

I hate magical all powerful super god like anything
and only have seen it done well once in the show "supernatural"
and they screwed that up eventually.


i am going to to tap out in less then 20 mins.
maybe i can try again. but i doubt it

i feel very sorry for the soap opera actress who likely hoped to have a real acting job
for once and jot this. yet another joke for a startrek show.

pirates were the first democratic organizations in the new world
and the first organizations where women could lead men

495 (edited by MalaNoche 2026-09-03 14:17:30)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

@inkblot

I liked episode 1 and episode 6, for me they are the best so far. Episode 2 also had potential, it was giving me classic Event Horizon vibes, maybe the lack of explanation ruined it for me, idk.

Anyway there aren't many Sci-Fi shows at the moment, so I guess I'm happy with what we get.

496

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

4x07

To me this episode felt more so than any other that they are making fun of Star Trek...

Deserved more runtime:
Abbys | Dead Like Me | Devs | Firefly | Gangsta. | Jack of all Trades | Kevin (probably) saves the World | Lodge 49 | Mrs. Davis | NYC 22 | Powerless | Roadkill | Special Unit 2 | Stumptown | Surface | The Brave | The Crazy Ones | The Finder | The Middleman | Truth Seekers | Two Weeks to Live | Whiskey Cavalier

https://next-episode.net/user/WilliamDrakeMcGregor/

497

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

piraterepublic wrote:
inkblot wrote:

And wth is a cartman?

if you do not know the name "Cartman"

you must be living in a cave without a tv.
he has been on tv for more then 25 years


i am sure the actors LOVED making this episode.
but it is the lowest possible level of scifi.

right down there with the puppets episode.
and equal with musicals.

I hate magical all powerful super god like anything
and only have seen it done well once in the show "supernatural"
and they screwed that up eventually.


i am going to to tap out in less then 20 mins.
maybe i can try again. but i doubt it

i feel very sorry for the soap opera actress who likely hoped to have a real acting job
for once and jot this. yet another joke for a startrek show.

Okay, I looked it up. There is a real plausible explanation for me not knowing cartman. I never liked the show so I never watched it. I also did not hang with people who did watch it. I just did not want to be quoted anything from that show. Same with Robot Chicken. When I do not  like a show, I do not watch it, ever, I have not watched a regular TV in over 30 years.

For the simple reason, that time is precious and my own. I have not seen any commercials. I download what I watch, watch it and delete it. I have however noticed, that the more popular a show is, the less they show you, because of commercials. Which is kinda backwards, if you ask me. And that is how I avoided the plague you call a show.

I even had to look up the show because the vernacular South Park is not in my dictionary, but thank you for making me add it.

As for the soap opera thing. Have you ever watched one? My wife does, every time I walk into her viewing room, I can tell in an instant what she is watching.

Soap operas are over bright, way to much color and the audio has a slight hollow effect. And they talk for dramatic effect, I take it that the audio one is because they film in a soundproof studio. So I can tell. Thats why the minute I seen Anson Mounts reaction, I understood it, and I was saying the same thing. And oh look, it was a soap.

I guess that means other people think so as well.

498 (edited by inkblot 2026-09-03 19:31:34)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

WilliamDrakeMcGregor wrote:

4x07

To me this episode felt more so than any other that they are making fun of Star Trek...

Really? No flashbacks to season three episode 2, or TOS? The dude even looks and talks like Trelane. Thats how I found out the original died in 2011. I looked him up. He was that close in my memory, and he did a bang up job of it.

Having fun with, or making fun of, are two different things, like laughing with you or at you are.

499 (edited by piraterepublic 2026-09-03 19:46:31)

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:

Soap operas are over bright, way to much color and the audio has a slight hollow effect. And they talk for dramatic effect, I take it that the audio one is because they film in a soundproof studio. So I can tell. Thats why the minute I seen Anson Mounts reaction, I understood it, and I was saying the same thing. And oh look, it was a soap.

I guess that means other people think so as well.


within the first minute of this episode i was questioning if it was a soap opera or making fun of TOS and shatner's acting.
it could have been going either way.

i would have preferred if everyone has been acting like shatner in tos.

have i watched a soap opera? never an entire one.
but i have had to sit, while long minutes of my life drift away, while visiting elderly family members and they seem to watch nothing but soap operas.
at least most soap operas are bad because they cant do better, and not on purpose.
( i hear mexican tele novelas are even more over the top with crasy writers and crazy actors)

pirates were the first democratic organizations in the new world
and the first organizations where women could lead men

500

Re: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

inkblot wrote:

Really? No flashbacks to season three episode 2, or TOS? The dude even looks and talks like Trelane. Thats how I found out the original died in 2011. I looked him up. He was that close in my memory, and he did a bang up job of it.

Having fun with, or making fun of, are two different things, like laughing with you or at you are.

Not Trelane, the Soap... I never watched a soap opera and only have seen small clips of them - that is not something I would ever enjoy or associate with Star Trek.

Story was ok and especially the last scene was good.

Deserved more runtime:
Abbys | Dead Like Me | Devs | Firefly | Gangsta. | Jack of all Trades | Kevin (probably) saves the World | Lodge 49 | Mrs. Davis | NYC 22 | Powerless | Roadkill | Special Unit 2 | Stumptown | Surface | The Brave | The Crazy Ones | The Finder | The Middleman | Truth Seekers | Two Weeks to Live | Whiskey Cavalier

https://next-episode.net/user/WilliamDrakeMcGregor/