You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
You must login or register to post a reply
RSS topic feed
Posts: 51 to 75 of 77
51 Reply by inkblot 2025-12-24 17:30:56 (edited by inkblot 2025-12-24 17:43:33)
- Registered: 2016-06-10
- Posts: 587
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
some_one wrote:inkblot wrote:So by being kind and having empathy I am being woke, which is what I was trying to avoid all along? I don't want to live in this world anymore .
Exactly. And that's part of why these discussions keep getting so heated: exhaustion. For those of us who haven't bought into it, hearing the word "woke" often feels similar to watching a toddler throw a tantrum after being told to hand over a fork rather than poking the little sibling with it. Sure, nobody loves all the aimless pandering on TV; it just doesn't seem worse than the alternative, which some would seem to have us believe.
So basically either. A) Woke is being used wrong B) We are taking the word woke wrong Now I can see how grumpy old men sitting on the porch are made. Get off my lawn. Also what I have noticed over the last 30 or 40 years is that the language I grew up with is evolving. Things you could say back then are taboo now. Some of it I can see. But what I do not like is, when I make the mistake of using such a word now, people get right offended. Without considering the context I meant it in. I am sure I could give a few examples. But I won't. I have also been guilty of flying off the handle here, but thankfully the staff have been kind and just slapped my wrists. I really enjoyed your explanation. You should have been a teacher. You explained it in a non offensive way. Maybe you would also make a good shrink. But anyway, back on topic. If as you state that woke is empathy, then it stands to reason that it is a good thing. If so, why do people get bent out of shape? And why is it that, what they appear to call woke isn't? I use TV as entertainment. So when I sit down and turn on the TV, I wish to be entertained. My mistake in the past has been caring about what others think. But now, after your gracious explanation, they can byte my shiny metal a$$. Just like they did when Starbuck was cast with a female lead in BSG 2004. I did not like it at first, but I have to admit, she killed it as Starbuck. And they called it woke then. And they were very vocal about it. Maybe I should stay away from social media. Anyway, thank you again for taking the time.
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
inkblot wrote:Also what I have noticed over the last 30 or 40 years is that the language I grew up with is evolving. Things you could say back then are taboo now. Some of it I can see.
Yes, exactly. Language does change over time, and it only gets more annoying the longer you live, but that's always been the case. Do always keep in mind that things becoming offensive is often a case of people having been uncomfortable with it all along, but feeling it's too common to speak out against, back in the day. Or, sometimes, it's just the context that has changed. inkblot wrote:But what I do not like is, when I make the mistake of using such a word now, people get right offended. Without considering the context I meant it in.
Some people do overreact habitually. Some of those do that because they like to make things about themselves, some just like an excuse to criticise, some have genuine mental problems beyond that, but for some it's also because they have lived lives where they feel that lashing out is the only thing that has ever marginally improved anything. Or maybe they've just met too many people before you who did it intentionally to even consider you might not be one of those, anymore. If you try to remain polite, rather than getting defensive, everything should be fine. If you're in a group, the rest will understand. Just make an effort. There are also situations where you might be able to tell that you probably said something problematic, but nobody wants to be the one to call you out on it. Always feel free to ask, "did I say something stupid?". There's no shame in it whatsoever, because we all do sometimes. inkblot wrote:If as you state that woke is empathy, then it stands to reason that it is a good thing. If so, why do people get bent out of shape? And why is it that, what they appear to call woke isn't?
As you have already noted, there are as many definitions as there are people. That's because, ultimately, it doesn't describe a thing but a feeling a lot of people have, of being told how to behave. It just so happens that the people complaining about that the loudest are usually exactly the people nobody wants to listen to in the first place, those who take joy in putting others down. And then, over time, more and more causes get attached to it, basically anything those people don't like. When Florida's Ron DeSantis, who was doing a lot on campaigning on "end wokeness" at the time, was asked in court to actually define what that means, the best his staff could come up with was "the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them". This was in 2022. The term itself is meaningless, because any meaning it has or might have will instantly be eroded by broadening it for some additional cause or other. inkblot wrote:Just like they did when Starbuck was cast with a female lead in BSG 2004. I did not like it at first, but I have to admit, she killed it as Starbuck. And they called it woke then. And they were very vocal about it.
An excellent example. Was it necessary back then? No, really not. Did it ultimately matter? Also no. The result was ultimately no worse for it. But, some people just like to dig their heels in on everything. And that "everything" eventually got the name "wokeness" slapped on. inkblot wrote:Maybe I should stay away from social media.
Maybe. It'll always find a way to make you angry about something (even if it's just people on lawns). That's a built-in feature. We just gotta take care to not let that anger override our better judgement, which is always difficult. inkblot wrote:Anyway, thank you again for taking the time.
And thank you for having it. These are stressful times for everyone, it's always good if we can talk to rather than about each other.
53 Reply by inkblot 2025-12-25 00:23:23 (edited by inkblot 2025-12-25 00:24:29)
- Registered: 2016-06-10
- Posts: 587
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
some_one wrote:inkblot wrote:Also what I have noticed over the last 30 or 40 years is that the language I grew up with is evolving. Things you could say back then are taboo now. Some of it I can see.
Yes, exactly. Language does change over time, and it only gets more annoying the longer you live, but that's always been the case. Do always keep in mind that things becoming offensive is often a case of people having been uncomfortable with it all along, but feeling it's too common to speak out against, back in the day. Or, sometimes, it's just the context that has changed.
inkblot wrote:But what I do not like is, when I make the mistake of using such a word now, people get right offended. Without considering the context I meant it in.
Some people do overreact habitually. Some of those do that because they like to make things about themselves, some just like an excuse to criticise, some have genuine mental problems beyond that, but for some it's also because they have lived lives where they feel that lashing out is the only thing that has ever marginally improved anything. Or maybe they've just met too many people before you who did it intentionally to even consider you might not be one of those, anymore. If you try to remain polite, rather than getting defensive, everything should be fine. If you're in a group, the rest will understand. Just make an effort. There are also situations where you might be able to tell that you probably said something problematic, but nobody wants to be the one to call you out on it. Always feel free to ask, "did I say something stupid?". There's no shame in it whatsoever, because we all do sometimes.
inkblot wrote:If as you state that woke is empathy, then it stands to reason that it is a good thing. If so, why do people get bent out of shape? And why is it that, what they appear to call woke isn't?
As you have already noted, there are as many definitions as there are people. That's because, ultimately, it doesn't describe a thing but a feeling a lot of people have, of being told how to behave. It just so happens that the people complaining about that the loudest are usually exactly the people nobody wants to listen to in the first place, those who take joy in putting others down. And then, over time, more and more causes get attached to it, basically anything those people don't like. When Florida's Ron DeSantis, who was doing a lot on campaigning on "end wokeness" at the time, was asked in court to actually define what that means, the best his staff could come up with was "the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them". This was in 2022. The term itself is meaningless, because any meaning it has or might have will instantly be eroded by broadening it for some additional cause or other.
inkblot wrote:Just like they did when Starbuck was cast with a female lead in BSG 2004. I did not like it at first, but I have to admit, she killed it as Starbuck. And they called it woke then. And they were very vocal about it.
An excellent example. Was it necessary back then? No, really not. Did it ultimately matter? Also no. The result was ultimately no worse for it. But, some people just like to dig their heels in on everything. And that "everything" eventually got the name "wokeness" slapped on.
inkblot wrote:Maybe I should stay away from social media.
Maybe. It'll always find a way to make you angry about something (even if it's just people on lawns). That's a built-in feature. We just gotta take care to not let that anger override our better judgement, which is always difficult.
inkblot wrote:Anyway, thank you again for taking the time.
And thank you for having it. These are stressful times for everyone, it's always good if we can talk to rather than about each other.
Like in the old BBS days.  From now on I will avoid anything with woke in it. It is a waste of my time and the problem of the people complaining about it.

- nightcrow
- Smart Ass
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-05-16
- Posts: 1,919
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
Disclaimer 1: I have yet to catch up on the discussion in this thread, so this topic may have been addressed already. Disclaimer 2: I want it to be clear that I have no issues with anyone sexuality or otherwise. So, I have just watched the latest episode of Stranger Things. I find it hard to believe that there isn't some kind of clear pushed agenda in our entertainment. ▼Spoiler The latest episode spent almost 8 minutes discussing Wills sexuality and how him coming out is what is going to save the day and enable him to defeat Vecna Why is this so important for the producers to insert, why does the plot have to have ▼Spoiler anything to do anyones sexuality it has been a great show but now it just seems that the entire solution or culmination of the story hinges on ▼Spoiler Will coming out as gay. I couldn't care less if he had a boyfriend, or if he had some relationship issues like straight couples or even if they devoted a scene to him discussing things with Mike, like they did with Nancy and Jonathan. but for the plot to hinge on it is either super bad writing or they are trying to push their "Woke" (for lack of a better word) agenda. ▼Spoiler The story with Nancy on Jonathan in the melting room scene was also pointless but... Hollywood. Either way, it had no impact on the resolution of the story or contribution to the actual plot, they could have done exactly the same thing with Will, instead they chose to make it an integral part of the story and almost to say that without Will coming out as gay they won't be able to beat Vecna Why oh why?
Brothers! What we do in life...Echoes in Eternity!

- TeaAndApathy
- Member
- Offline
- From: my Own Little World
- Registered: 2013-12-04
- Posts: 510
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
Thought this might be appreciated by this thread. 
- Registered: 2025-11-30
- Posts: 6
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
I think nightcrow brings up reasonable questions about Stranger Things. That episode got a lot of pushback online that I'm not super interested in wading through (it's rough out there) but I too would appreciate some responses from the kind of thoughtful people on here. I don't watch the show and feel I would have to watch a lot of it to understand the context, so I'm looking forward to seeing what others post in response
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
jays wrote:I think nightcrow brings up reasonable questions about Stranger Things. That episode got a lot of pushback online that I'm not super interested in wading through (it's rough out there) but I too would appreciate some responses from the kind of thoughtful people on here. I don't watch the show and feel I would have to watch a lot of it to understand the context, so I'm looking forward to seeing what others post in response
We discussed it some in the other thread. Would probably be better to continue here though, if you'd like to add to it.
58 Reply by g371 2026-01-10 07:06:22 (edited by g371 2026-01-10 07:11:28)

- g371
- Member
- Offline
- From: Riga, Latvia
- Registered: 2013-11-08
- Posts: 1,002
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
jays wrote:I think if you want to watch spy shows it's generally better to not be hypersensitive to things that may be a bit unrealistic.
You all don't get this part, it's on a level of a brutal facepalm for some 200 million people. Basically the same as for Egyptians a black Cleopatra (just nobody will sue anybody this time, but for sure will be laughing). Which also proves the point that all those wokeness preachers and an enlightenment bringers are not very smart by default (assuming that this was a "diversity" decision). It's as stupid as to cast some Irish guy as an Indian chief in a western. But compared to all woke garbage what I have seen past years this is nothing, totally minor, they can do way more impressive performances.

- toidol
- Man with too much money...
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-02-27
- Posts: 1,589
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
jays wrote:I think nightcrow brings up reasonable questions about Stranger Things. That episode got a lot of pushback online that I'm not super interested in wading through (it's rough out there) but I too would appreciate some responses from the kind of thoughtful people on here. I don't watch the show and feel I would have to watch a lot of it to understand the context, so I'm looking forward to seeing what others post in response
I don’t watch Stranger Things, but this sounds like just bad writing. Plain and simple. Kinda reminds me of the discussions a few years back about female led movies all being bad and people saying it’s not that they hate women, but that the writing’s bad. Maybe there isn’t some big conspiracy this time either, but rather just that not all scripts are good and when there’s a lot of money going around even some bad stuff gets made.

- toidol
- Man with too much money...
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-02-27
- Posts: 1,589
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
g371 wrote:You all don't get this part, it's on a level of a brutal facepalm for some 200 million people.
I’d love to see where you got that number.. Or is it the same place where I saw that 7,5 billion people were either for it or didn’t care? Which also proves the point that all those anti-wokeness preachers and an enlightment blockers are not very smart by default.

- g371
- Member
- Offline
- From: Riga, Latvia
- Registered: 2013-11-08
- Posts: 1,002
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
TeaAndApathy wrote:pull in a new audience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2ngB-zjVmM Summed up nice.
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
First of all: Posting random video essays is just about one of the shittiest ways to contribute to any kind of discussion. It only works to suggests that you can't make your own point in a way that meshes with what has already been said, and that you want to waste everyone's time by getting them to spend a quarter hour listening to some rando who may or may not make your point for you. Picking a guy who talks in an intentionally obnoxious tone the whole time only makes it worse. Just... don't. Second: That guy doesn't seem to be "summing up" anything at all, or does he start doing it at the end? The first few minutes are just listing examples, stating his take on them and then moving on before anyone has time to question any of it too much. That's almost the opposite of a summary; it's hammering a point home with quantity over quality. Third: Are you under the impression that you are not getting your point across, rather than being confronted with people who understand what you are saying but simply think, for a variety of reasons, that you are wrong?

- g371
- Member
- Offline
- From: Riga, Latvia
- Registered: 2013-11-08
- Posts: 1,002
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
Nope, it sums up in a super compact way trash that otherwise would waste hours of my time trying to explain - with examples and pretty solid reasoning. And the tone is spot on, because the topic is as obnoxious and absolutely deserves it. Plus this is just one subsection of woke madness - the "modern audience" myth, an imaginary audience that does not exist. All shit catered to it flops. And now even Disney is fantasizing how to get young male viewers back, after for years doing all they can to lose them.

- g371
- Member
- Offline
- From: Riga, Latvia
- Registered: 2013-11-08
- Posts: 1,002
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
And he has covered more in other videos, so, if somebody still is lost what "woke" in movies/TV means, there is the best concentrated explanations with arrows and examples. I agree to some 70% of what he is saying and 100% to how he is saying it. He obviously has spent thinking way more about this than I ever want to. A well formulated points and reasoning. That's what people in general think outside of "safe" minority bubbles. Even if they are not saying it (especially in certain countries/areas, because tolerance there is just in theory, in practice is more Stalin style tolerance ).
65 Reply by some_one 2026-01-14 22:16:03 (edited by some_one 2026-01-15 07:19:04)
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
g371 wrote:That's what people in general think outside of "safe" minority bubbles..
Getting into straw man territory there. Some argumentum ad populum maybe. Did you, at any point, ask yourself whether you, yourself, might have wandered into a bubble at some point without realizing? g371 wrote:All shit catered to it flops.
Some selection bias for flavour here? All movies are, by definition, made "for modern audiences", unless and even if they are primarily made for nostalgia. If you want two thoughts to connect ("excessively diverse casting" and "movie flops"), then picking only movies where both happens and ignoring everything else sure is a good strategy. It's less useful for finding truth, but it does help with making literally any point you want to pretend is true. g371 wrote:He obviously has spent thinking way more about this than I ever want to. A well formulated points and reasoning.
Except he hasn't, as half of what he is saying are merely assumptions and assurances with no attempt to prove them whatsoever. There is no distinction between premise and conclusion. Basically "trust me bro". If even that already counts as "thinking about this", then are you saying you haven't thought anything through at all before speaking up? In that case, what are you hoping to contribute here? g371 wrote:Nope, it sums up in a super compact way trash that otherwise would waste hours of my time trying to explain
The title clearly says that this is a "discussion thread". What, exactly, do you think a discussion is? Beating people over the head with your opinion until they stop bothering to disagree? If you are not actually trying to discuss (that is: read, understand and respond), then what are you even doing here?

- toidol
- Man with too much money...
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-02-27
- Posts: 1,589
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
some_one don’t bother. g371 is not and has never been interested in a discussion or other points of view. You may have noticed how they just sidestepped the points I made few posts ago. They never responds to any points you might make. They’ll just spout their unfounded “stats” like they are some high truth that everyone knows but some woke people are trying to ignore to turn kids gay or something. I’ll give this thread about five more posts from them before we get to them saying woke movies are the reason Putin is waging war and the whole war is woke gay people’s fault. At least that’s how these have gone in the past.
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
toidol wrote:don’t bother.
I despise this attitude. The sad truth about discussions in a group or public setting is that, whenever an uninterested party becomes involved, they inevitably become debates. Where a discussion is about discovering truth, a debate is about showing to anyone else who may be listening in that the other person is being stupid about something. Every single time somebody using the "my ignorance matters" approach goes uncontested, it encourages even more people to do the same thing. Over time and repetition, that erodes the very concept of truth. That's how the way of public discourse is held has become as futile as it is now in the first place. Never leave things uncontested. Too often "not my problem" will eventually gain a "yet".

- toidol
- Man with too much money...
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-02-27
- Posts: 1,589
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
Good for you for having the energy to do that. I’ve done my 15 rounds with them already and just wanted to give you a heads up so you know what’s in store for you. Good luck, have fun

- z1rra
- The Troll King
- Offline
- Registered: 2008-05-29
- Posts: 1,625
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
This topic gets circulated in every god damn show thread too. Just tired of it. Someone doesn't like a thing and it's because of woke. I mean the recent Stranger Things example was a bit ham-handed for sure, but goddamn how everyone seems to missing the point, that Will was extremely ashamed of something and had to come to terms for it to be able to go against Vecna. So yeah, maybe not handled the best, but the wokeness bit is not what made it a bit cringe. But yeah, pointless to argue with them dudes. As they say, they bring you down to your level of stupidity and then beat you with experience.
- Registered: 2019-07-07
- Posts: 316
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
toidol wrote:Good for you for having the energy to do that. I’ve done my 15 rounds with them already and just wanted to give you a heads up so you know what’s in store for you.
Again, you are working off the assumption that the goal is to change the mind of the person you are talking to. In a debate, it is not. I do not have "the energy to do that", but I do invest what little I can spare, because it can help in the broader scope. Besides, I am familiar with the way g371 thinks; this here just happened to be an unusually useless contribution to the point of notability.
- Registered: 2016-06-10
- Posts: 587
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
The only people that can change their minds, are open minded people. It is ok to be stubborn, but not to the point of stupidity. I actually learned quite a bit, by reading and participating in a non confrontational way. I find that method to be the easiest. But every now and then we all slip a bit. Here is to reading more of this fabulous thread.

- TeaAndApathy
- Member
- Offline
- From: my Own Little World
- Registered: 2013-12-04
- Posts: 510
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
An interesting and thoughtful article. More thoughtful than just "it's all DEI BS". https://deadline.com/2026/01/bbc-color- … 236702132/

- proteinnerd
- Revolutionary
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-02-07
- Posts: 1,826
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
Thanks for sharing, I managed to miss this earlier somehow. Great video.

- nightcrow
- Smart Ass
- Offline
- Registered: 2007-05-16
- Posts: 1,919
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
I’m still yet to catch up on this thread, but for those who prefer to avoid “woke” content (and I understand that this term is still vague for some) I found that this site helps me out a little bit, even though there isn’t much traffic and it’s still a bit buggy, however it seems to do the job: https://www.wokeornot.net/
Brothers! What we do in life...Echoes in Eternity!
- Registered: 2016-06-10
- Posts: 587
Re: The "woke" discussion thread
nightcrow wrote:I’m still yet to catch up on this thread, but for those who prefer to avoid “woke” content (and I understand that this term is still vague for some) I found that this site helps me out a little bit, even though there isn’t much traffic and it’s still a bit buggy, however it seems to do the job: https://www.wokeornot.net/
Thank you. But since I am not sure what woke really is, how can I be expected to rate movies that might or could be woke? It just adds to the confusion.
Posts: 51 to 75 of 77
Pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
You must login or register to post a reply
|