|
||||||||
|
You are not logged in. Please login or register. Vikings: ValhallaForums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Vikings: Valhalla Posts: 141 2022-01-30 15:25:59 (edited by merc 2022-01-30 15:26:19)Topic: Vikings: Valhallahttps://next-episode.net/vikings-valhalla Follow-up series to 'Vikings' set 100 years afterward and centering on the adventures of Leif Erikson, Freydis, Harald Harada and the Norman King William the Conqueror. This should be worth a lookin if you liked the orginal Vikings? 2 2022-01-30 15:44:30 (edited by g371 2022-01-30 15:58:12)
Re: Vikings: ValhallaI'll watch it, but imo what made Vikings truly great, were these three and the story around them, all the rest is just riding on their epic performance
They managed to achieve the effect that you feel like you are on a battlefield while watching it Basically most of associations I have with Vikings, are Ragnar doing something. That guy is like he was born for this role, on the same level as Schwarzenegger in Terminator. Re: Vikings: ValhallaAgreed, Ragnar is so iconic in Vikings. Everything without him was pretty "meh": not bad, but far from great. Ivar had potential, but didn't fulfill it. Re: Vikings: Valhallalowrider wrote:
what was pathetic about Ivar - his eyes turned blue lol so his bones just collapsed...I ask you what a stoopid end 5 2022-02-25 23:58:44 (edited by merc 2022-02-27 14:17:23)Re: Vikings: Valhallawell I have watched the first 1 and 1/2 eps and find it boring. lacklustre. one viking is as much like any other. They always better the pathetic Saxons. None of the actors have any real charisma unlike the original show as mentioned above. Fortunately it is an 8 eps all at once Netflix show so no need to wait week after week for the next less than interesting eps. Binge watch them one week end well starts to pick up at eps 4 ▼Spoiler 6 2022-03-01 09:18:42 (edited by fassy 2022-03-01 09:25:53)Re: Vikings: ValhallaPfffff... I found it quite bad. Somehow managed to sit through it but most of the time I felt like I can't stand it anymore. And started to skip scenes... Weak leads, the only ones who do a decent job is Bradley Freegard and Laura Berlin. The rest ranges from forgettable to just yuck. Especially Sam Corlett and Frida Gustavsson cannot carry the show. Their acting is plainly awful and lacks character. So, take bad acting, poor character development, a bit of wokeness sprinkled into a boring and uninteresting story line... then you get Vikings: Valhalla. Utter disappointment.
Re: Vikings: Valhallafassy wrote:
Jupp, tho I have only seen 4eps so far, King Canute is the only one with any form for screen presence. The rest feels bland and weak. So far the Queen actor has not done anything worthy of note, maybe the impression will change in the last 4 episodes. Re: Vikings: Valhallaso season 2 is back and ....... 9 2023-01-14 15:06:23 (edited by merc 2023-01-14 15:10:25)Re: Vikings: Valhallaso finished all 8 eps and some good fight scenes but crackpot plots ▼Spoiler Re: Vikings: Valhallaseason 3. getting to the point of too many story lines, flitting backwards and forwards all the time Re: Vikings: ValhallaI really tried to give it another go... but sorry.... those actors are just killing it for me. Re: Vikings: Valhallafassy wrote:
well they had a bit of fully body nudity this season! Re: Vikings: Valhallamerc wrote:
Well, since the average low budget porn movie casts better actors... I can just go with those if I really need to see naked bodies.
Re: Vikings: Valhallamerc wrote:
They did? Sensored on Netflix or something? Cant remember that. Posts: 14Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Vikings: Valhalla |
||||||||
Follow