Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Law
Second ep was much better and more like what I was expecting. Also there's another mid-credits scene after the fancy bit of credits, probably just to annoy @merc.
You are not logged in. Please login or register. She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (Page 2 of 4)Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → She-Hulk: Attorney at Law Posts: 26 to 50 of 76Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawSecond ep was much better and more like what I was expecting. Also there's another mid-credits scene after the fancy bit of credits, probably just to annoy @merc. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawscorpius074 wrote:
Naah, it's still usable, but just as a variable. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawso far a dud show. eps2 boring. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmrverene wrote:
▼Spoiler Yeah, this is the best episode thus far IMO. It was so good, I kinda wish it was a couple of mins longer. Clocked in at a little under 28 mins, it definitely hits the sweet spot for me. I don't see any point in stretching 28 mins worth of ideas into 42 mins or 42 mins worth of writing into 120+ mins... That's the mistake a lot of showrunners make more often than not these days. I liked the premiere as well, but that had a lot to do with some of the Easter eggs, QR codes, and foreshadowing... ▼Spoiler Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawI'm rather annoyed lately with Marvels 5min+ credits in the TV Shows and 20 min credits on their movies. 31 2022-09-01 18:20:36 (edited by merc 2022-09-01 19:54:59)Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Laweps 3. SO this is a comedy then? Maybe I am just not in the mood for this show. but give me Ms Marvel any day! Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
Yes please, take Ms Marvel away forever, you're welcome to her, I don't want to see her ever again. 2020. Meh.
Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawEasycore wrote:
agreed Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
People who work on the movies/tv shows deserve recognition of their work. Without people working off screen there's no job for people on screen. ...where did I put that rat's ass I could give?
Daemons are benevolent or benign nature spirits, beings of the same nature as both mortals and gods, similar to ghosts, chthonic heroes, spirit guides, forces of nature or the gods themselves. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawIs there some reason folks can't just fast forward to the mid-credits scene and then just turn it off? It's not like it's you've got to sit through them to start a new game+ or something. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawDaemonius wrote:
why? they got paid for a job. They aint movie stars craving attention Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
Ah, merc again, always full of love and compassion for his fellow human beings... Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia 38 2022-09-02 15:27:15 (edited by merc 2022-09-02 15:33:51)Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmrverene wrote:
thats what people do ? But zipping forward mostly means you shoot past the proper start so you have to go back then forward, then... grrrrr. For shows meant for tv with adverts inbetween these are used to pad out the time so you get a 30 minute show that is really just 25 minutes. This diminuation happend to the first 2 eps of Stargirl where those on DC streaming were longer than on the CW? channel. Ms Marvel was a bad offender - you have to wonder how much money was spent on the opening/closing credits - in Ms Marvels case they aint just streams of names against a black background but some expensive film work, that could could have been spent on the show proper. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
just finished eps 1 of season 3 of Stargirl. Closing credits just 20 seconds...... 40 2022-09-08 17:27:45 (edited by merc 2022-09-08 17:33:59)Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Laweps 4. can it get any worse? 5 minute of interest with 20 minutes of dross. and 5 mins or so closing credits. This eps was not really about She-Hulk at all but Wang: take him away any you have 25 minutes of dross Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at LawNo mid/post-credits in ep 5. You're welcome @merc Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmrverene wrote:
eh? still about 5 minutes of them at end 45 2022-09-16 12:34:25 (edited by mrverene 2022-09-16 14:34:54)Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawbut completely skippable apart from the drawing of all the shoes. but the internet paused and over-analyzed that frame so you don't have to. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawso this series is the tv series version of a chick-flick? What is enjoyable is how they fit shehulk with the real people.eps 5 was much better. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
I still think the CGI in this is awful. 2020. Meh.
Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawgraybags wrote:
Seriously can't help but see princess shrek all the time. its awful. Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawnightcrow wrote:
it is certainly not in the class of Hawkeye, Loki or Wandavision. It is just a time filler Re: She-Hulk: Attorney at Lawmerc wrote:
Hawkeye doesn't even belong in the same sentence with the other two! (The show was a bit disappointing.) I really can live with the CGI here. Yes, could have been better, but it doesn't distract me from the story. Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Posts: 26 to 50 of 76Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → She-Hulk: Attorney at Law |
||||||||