Re: Star Trek: Picard
Everyone knows Patrick Stewart gained his fame by doing a small but significant role as Richard Lionheart in Robin Hood: Men In Tights.
|
||||||||
You are not logged in. Please login or register. Star Trek: Picard (Page 3 of 8)Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Star Trek: Picard Posts: 51 to 75 of 181Re: Star Trek: PicardEveryone knows Patrick Stewart gained his fame by doing a small but significant role as Richard Lionheart in Robin Hood: Men In Tights. Re: Star Trek: Picarddavejo90 wrote:
Then you'll be happy to hear that Picard is supposed to have 10: "Stewart revealed in January 2019 that the series would consist of 10 episodes" I'm not sure, but I guess rising costs are at least one reason for fewer episodes per season. And if a show doesn't meet expectations, it's also cheaper to put an end to it (less sunk costs). z1rra_1 wrote:
Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Star Trek: Picardgraybags wrote:
Well duh obviously because that little green mogwai is supercute! Re: Star Trek: Picardscorpius074 wrote:
I've never seen DS9 or Voyager, but might pick up TNG I've been recommended TNG by many friends, but never had the drive to watch it. I really have no clue as to why it was never interesting enough for me to even concider. Might have something to do with Enterprise being kind of bland. scorpius074 wrote:
I think in hindsight the compelling factors of Firefly and Farscape was the cast and the fact the story could go quite dark at times. While i never thought ST could be as interesting. scorpius074 wrote:
As I grew older what you describe is true. I think I was lucky being young when some of the greatest sci fi shows aired. Nowadays we are served with utter shit more often than not, the creativity is mostly gone, and no CGI can make up for that. scorpius074 wrote:
I should rephrase, not necessarily a fan but I really like him as an actor. A fan would as you say probably have watched more of his stuff scorpius074 wrote:
Couldn't agree more! Re: Star Trek: PicardMoze wrote:
It's a real shame that Firefly didn't live longer, but those were also a few of the reasons why I enjoyed watching both shows. Farscape in particular was such a unique approach to the genre and television in general. Jim Henson puppetry and clever non-CGI use of special effects made it pretty much stand the test of time. The early parts of the first season was a real chore for me to watch at the time, but it truly soared after the introduction of you-know-who. There’s so much quality TV available nowadays that it’s almost intimidating how much gets churned out. I was going to wait and binge Star Trek: Picard once it was done, but it seemed like a Herculean task when I already have such a huge backlog of other stuff to watch looming over the horizon. So I decided to go with the weekly serving instead. This should interest some... Re: Star Trek: Picard‘Star Trek: Picard’ breaks streaming records on CBS All Access Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Star Trek: PicardGreat news. I think what also helped it was the fact that Picard was ordered for season 2 as well, before season 1 even aired. Plus the quality of the actors and the theme alone will have the fans drooling. I know I am --== Warning. This message will self destruct in 24h. ==--
Re: Star Trek: Picardz1rra_1 wrote:
I totally see where you're coming from there, I never watched Originals or Vampire Diaries, but I watch Legacies... I mean it's like the X-Men Academy but with magic. I have no idea about any series lore until it's mentioned and I roll with it pretty easily. I have a friend into the whole franchise who thinks I'm crazy. Re: Star Trek: Picardlighton wrote:
At least most of them, but that Lone Wolf & Cub shtick will stay compelling for only so long... unless it takes a page or two from, what I feel is the best SW property, the 2008 Clone Wars series and begins to not only include the larger SW Universe but we really need our samurai to become more developed. My biggest criticism of Mandalorian thought is the amount of plot armor the main characters had... ▼Spoiler Not that I didn't enjoy the trip, I just don't want to end up with that type of fatigue which personifies series in which the lion share of the series momentum gets spent before for program ends. No offence to folks who still enjoy watching their favorite characters persevere but continuing on past a natural end point or with a premises that never evolves, today, is folly. Something I hope Picard keeps in mind as it goes on... speaking of which time to see where Jean-Luc's search takes him next 60 2020-01-31 04:59:00 (edited by TheFizza 2021-09-24 04:48:34)Re: Star Trek: PicardMoze wrote:
That's one of my issues with Enterprise as well... but I have issues with Voyager because I don't think it ever really fulfilled it's premise so I might be too much of an Telelitist Gawd love both of those series (I know I do) but they may not be as enjoyable to as Voyager and DS9 which both could translate more to the modern audience. Not to say I don't recommend every fan of any Trek to try something else in the franchisee, even the cartoon, I feel it should be pointed out that it can be as boring as it can be frustrating seeing very little consequences continue or linger from episode-to-episode. With, of course, some notable exceptions. ▼Spoiler Moze wrote:
I HEART Farscape A LOT but you're not necessarily correct about Trek not getting dark because DS9 got DARK! scorpius074 wrote:
Moze wrote:
I can see the points both of you make but I disagree with the conclusion it seems you've come to, Moze. I think we live in THE MOST AMAZING TIME for SF on the small screen. While I agree it is true that there seems to be a sort of unified homogenization of the future there still seems to be different interpretations and even ideals. Not the ideals of the 1960's when Trek was a reflective utopia, was needed, but of the 21st Century when a more realistic look can be just as idealistic. From The Expanse to (the now defunked) Dark Matter we can see the same ideals of Trek as they battle through the malaise of indifference and cruelty, reflecting today, as they fight for a better tomorrow. scorpius074 wrote:
Moze wrote:
I enjoyed reading your comments and scorpius074 I think you point to the heart of things here... That being said, while I am very excited for the series to keep up the quality I see here in the first ep but I have a Four Episode test for new series, so I'll reserve (most of my) judgment, until then Re: Star Trek: PicardCBS Makes Star Trek: Picard Pilot Free On YouTube 'For a Limited Time' (but only in the US) Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Star Trek: Picardlighton wrote:
Lol, that that even stops anyone anymore. DRM "manages access" in the same way that Prison "manages freedom".
http://xkcd.com/488/ Re: Star Trek: PicardWizard wrote:
Ask around at the nearest mall - many have no clue. Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Star Trek: PicardIt's weird to hear people curse in Star Trek... ...where did I put that rat's ass I could give?
Daemons are benevolent or benign nature spirits, beings of the same nature as both mortals and gods, similar to ghosts, chthonic heroes, spirit guides, forces of nature or the gods themselves. Re: Star Trek: Picardlighton wrote:
Also, check out some of the comments from the slashdot.org link when you get a chance. Re: Star Trek: PicardTheFizza wrote:
Well, I've seen every new sci fi show the last decades and I stand firmly by my point! The only new sci fi shows I've really liked is The Expanse, The Orville, Travelers and maybe Dark Matter as well. I guess it makes sense Travelers and Dark Matter was ok since it's some of the writers/producers of Stargate who made the shows. Again the nominator in those shows are a good likable cast with creative storytelling. And little to no political biases. (which is very hard to come by these days) Re: Star Trek: PicardRe: Star Trek: PicardIt seems to be a slow burn show. Not for Trekkies? And the show theme song must be hated ( by them) Re: Star Trek: Picardmerc_1 wrote:
The theme tune has a hint of Star Trek in it, as for slow, I think it's going at a speed designed to introduce the cast and what they do and the history behind the plot. At the moment I'm intrigued to see how it's all going to develope and who are the 'goodies and baddies'. Re: Star Trek: PicardI might be wrong but since when did you take Earl Grey tea with milk? a travesty? 71 2020-02-02 22:31:22 (edited by merc_1 2020-02-02 22:54:15)Re: Star Trek: Picarddavejo90 wrote:
not complaining but since when did star trek bother about introducing the cast lol ▼Spoiler Re: Star Trek: Picardmerc_1 wrote:
Why not? merc_1 wrote:
Why? I think it nicely fits the really good intro. Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia 73 2020-02-06 13:41:41 (edited by merc_1 2020-02-06 13:44:06)Re: Star Trek: Picardlighton wrote:
well no beam me up Scottie no Spock raised eyebrow well I seem to remember the theme song to Enterprise was hated by Trekkie types as it wasn't an overture type thing? Picards is even less so. Re: Star Trek: PicardWell, you just can't please everyone. Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Posts: 51 to 75 of 181Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Star Trek: Picard |
||||||||