Just going to touch on one aspect of that.
Context: I've been to about 40 countries over 20 year in the performance of my work, ranging from Lebanon to Singapore, UAE, England and more.
> USA lives in a stone age compared to what they have (starting with the hilarious fact that 52% of USA population has no passports).
That's not stone age. That's geography. That's having a country so large and diverse they really aren't needed. You can travel from desert to beach to mountains to green plains all in one country. And its a great country with no real feeling that we *need* to experience other countries. American's don't have to go to Italy to tour wine country, we have that. We don't have to go to Switzerland to ski, we have that. We don't have to go the Mediterranean for beach resorts, we have that.
I get it: If I were in London I'd be looking to go somewhere else too. If I lived where most countries were the size of US states or smaller, then yeah I'd need a passport just so I can cross the river to go to Paris for a decent lunch or have to go to Germany because they have that great hobby shop with the amazing paint I like so much or they have the auto repair shop I trust with my car.
And honestly - the way so much of the world is being overrun - the *desire* to go to a lot of these countries is diminishing annually. Every year there's more leaks about the UK gov't hiding their knowledge of Paki r@pe gangs and the numbers are climbing over 2m cases now. Nobody sees that as a vacation destination. Nor do they want to go to Paris and get harassed at a sidewalk cafe for having wine by a group of immigrants because its against Shiria. Italy and Greece are in the news weekly with 40k at a time surging the borders. Who is going out of there way to get a passport so they can go there when they can just as easily take a local flight to California Napa valley, or Big Bear or go to New England or Florida?
So no - its not about being in the stone age.