1

Topic: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

https://next-episode.net/for-all-mankind

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zzmrmjlESjQ/maxresdefault.jpg

The series explores what would have happened if the global space race had never ended.

In an alternate timeline,,  in 1969 a Soviet cosmonaut,  Alexei Leonov, becomes the first human to land on the Moon.  This outcome devastates morale at NASA,  but also catalyzes an American effort to catch up.  With the Soviet Union emphasizing diversity by including a woman in subsequent landings,  the United States is forced to match the pace,  by training women and minorities,  whom were largely excluded from the initial decades of the U.S. space exploration program.

2

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

I like it myself, an interesting take on what could have happened in an alternative earth if things had gone a little different in the space race.

3 (edited by merc 2022-06-11 12:35:08)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

thanks for that I will take a look.

4

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Just watch 3x01 and was bored.  There was just no sense of suspense at all.

5

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

I agree it was a boring poorly done season opener compared to the last season. Lets hope for better writing for the rest of the episodes

6

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

03x04 was one of the best episodes yet.

7 (edited by graybags 2022-07-01 10:06:49)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

While I like this, what annoys me is that everyone is so... nice.  Things that would really annoy me if they happened to me just get accepted with a smile and sometimes a cuddle, and I think "No!  In real life you'd be sworn at and despised forever."  Something happens and I think "Ooooh, they're not going to like that!", but no, everyone just "understands".

I work in a very big place, with alot of people.  When someone does something good, while you might mutter under your breath "well done", or "nice one mate", we don't whoop, cheer and clap, jump around and throw our fists in the air.

Maybe I'm just too English.

2020.  Meh.

8

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Duplicat wrote:

S3x05 ,,
  WAHOOO !!  ,,  Team work makes the Dream work..
[ congrats , handshaking , cheering , clapping , jumping around and fist pumping the air ]
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EeWrjsdWAAE22L9.jpg
BUT WAIT ! ...  There appears to be some controversy... (and after everyone was getting along so nicely)
The officials are reviewing the slow-motion instant replay..

Stay tuned,  we'll be back after another exciting week of commercials,, an other stuff.

Spoiler

"" I can't see clearly bruh , the dust ain't gone..  I think there is obstacles in our way..
Gone are the dark clouds that had radar blind..  It's gonna be a bright RED sunshiny day ""

Spoiler

Well they did happen to have NASA's engine design on their ship

9

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Still watching and about to watch 3x09, I really like the show so far.

10

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Duplicat wrote:

S3x09
SURPRISE !
Just when you thought that the drama of a ménage à trois of Space administrations were reluctantly starting to gel, and that the mishaps of living on Mars were starting to wind-down for the upcoming season closer.
SURPRISE !!
2 bombshells get dropped in the ending of the episode, and the episode closer is a DOOZY.
https://media.tenor.com/images/f86b51ae9126249b93dec339818bd25d/tenor.png

Just watched it and damn you're right, can't wait for the next one that episode left me on the edge of my seat.

11

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Spoiler

Man, i dont know what to say. Found it very exiting on the way to Mars, but somehow they tend to stop in the middle of an action scene, and just fast forward. And backtrack it with boring dialog instead.

And as soon as they land on Mars the show goes downhill.

Like what the hell, you are basically trapped on a planet, and then you go and get pregnant, how the f would an astronaut or cosmonaut even consider this being a viable move? Are they braindead? Didn't even consider the consequences for a child birth at a life threatening mission?
These people are supposed to be the best trained people on the earth. But apparently no one have a brain.

And then they decide to let the stupid pregnant girl be launched out in space, while the rest stay put and die, just because she couldnt swallow instead of getting a cream pie.

And then we magically have a north korean mars landing.... cmon what the f.

And then all the closet gay stuff happening, that noone cared about in the late 90s.. In the west at least. But i guess in this universe it's a big f deal.

Not to mention the stupid sub plot with hippies bombing nasa, like cmon.

So many stupid things are happening its impossible to take the show serious. I'm realizing now while ranting that i dislike almost every character and storylines in this show. Guess I should have stopped watching a long time ago, I'm just too starved for sci fi to let go.

12

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

I liked this show and with the ending of e10 it will be interesting to see how S4 picks up the threads. Not too worried about the things that @Moze mentions I just liked it for entertainment without reading too much into it.

13 (edited by h3ctic 2022-11-05 22:58:05)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

I also liked this show, its not superb like Expanse or BSG, but it has its own place I think. I agree with Moze about the subplot

Spoiler

with hippies bombing nasa

didnt like that much.

Ohh..and Moze..you should probably [ spoiler ] a few things in your last post in this discussion IMHO smile

I've had several posts regarding the tendency nowadays to add in gays and minorities just to check boxes and be sure that everyone gets representation; this show is a very good example I think where gays do get represented and in  a good way where they have interessting stories.

For me its 4/5.

Edit: oh...Im not very observant...just only now figured out its co-created by Ronald D. Moore big_smile

14

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

h3ctic wrote:

Ohh..and Moze..you should probably [ spoiler ] a few things in your last post in this discussion IMHO smile

Guess the whole post should be a spoiler, but if you are reading on a show and have not watched the latest episodes, you are bound to get burned sooner than later. Common internet sense to not look up info about a series you have not watched the newest episode.

h3ctic wrote:

Edit: oh...Im not very observant...just only now figured out its co-created by Ronald D. Moore big_smile

Ouch, didnt know this either. Man he has some great titles behind him, but then again seems it went downhill after BSG. I guess some may even argue it went downhill after the first few seasons of BSG.

15

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

just finished s04e07...that ending big_smile

16

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Originally posted by Celleron:

https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/news/2024/0 … star-city/

Spin off series for this excellent show announced.

17

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

2years waiting now...is this a joke...

18

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

lassegoa wrote:

2years waiting now...is this a joke...

Not wrong.  I come from an age where we had 24 episodes per season, and they started every year in September.
Now its 10 episodes every 24 months.  Whisky Tango Foxtrot.

Seems like all this new technology for greater special effects is REALLY REALLY inefficient.  Less than half the episodes with 4x the time to make them.  Makes you wish they went back to the tech from Star Trek The Next Generation: Funny how they got all those shows out on time every year.

19

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

SgtSaint wrote:

Not wrong.  I come from an age where we had 24 episodes per season, and they started every year in September.
Now its 10 episodes every 24 months.  Whisky Tango Foxtrot.

Seems like all this new technology for greater special effects is REALLY REALLY inefficient.  Less than half the episodes with 4x the time to make them.  Makes you wish they went back to the tech from Star Trek The Next Generation: Funny how they got all those shows out on time every year.

It's not about the effects at all. It's about scheduling. Back in the day, an actor signing on for a show would be doing only that for the next who knows how many years. To ever move up in pay grade would mean to either become really valuable to the producers of that show, or to drop out and find something else. There's a reason why there used to be "movie" and "TV" actors, with being in the former category usually being equated to being successful.

These days, you see actors who have been at the top of the business for literally decades suddenly doing their first starring roles on TV shows. That's because the shorter seasons that are not released every year simply mean that they can be involved in many projects at once, rather than having to have one of them be their entire job. It's also a benefit for actors starting out, because they can use the fact that they are currently well-known for a role in one project to promote other side projects, thus avoiding to get stuck with one role.

It's just all around better for the industry this way. It's slightly annoying for us viewers, but we do also get a lot more different things to watch in return.

20

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

I was in complete agreement with you right up to the last line:

some_one wrote:

It's just all around better for the industry this way. It's slightly annoying for us viewers, but we do also get a lot more different things to watch in return.


• It's just all around better for the industry this way.
No.  Its better for the actor's wallet.  Instead of a million a year they can make three.  "The industry" on the other hand... You'd have to show me something really convincing for that metric.  Because the work crews don't have as stable of income trying to be on 3 shows of 10 eps as they were when the carpenters et.al. were attached to a single show all year every year.  Now its mostly "Short attention-span theater" for the TikTok generation.

• we do also get a lot more different things to watch in return.
But most them aren't anywhere near as great to watch. More variety of "so-so" shows and less "can't wait" shows.  I'd rather have half as many shows that are much better.  Compare Star Trek TNG or DS9 with its richer stories, longer plot arcs... hell they HAVE plot arcs... to something like Star Trek Strange New Worlds with its anthology format of 1 comedy, 1 musical, 1 fantasy, 1 action {...} but zero story arc.  We'll never see something akin to the DS9 arc of the Jem Hadar war in any of these 10 episode shorts. Or a Battlestar Galactica, or a Babylon 5.  Now they are all just Black Mirror type shows that happen to have all 10 episodes in the same place but otherwise almost no connection.

21

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Is this show just the drama drama, or does it have some aspects of adventure or even action? I see someone mentioned its not as good as the expanse, and I loved expanse, but I don't know if its worth to start watching this now and invest this much time in (5 seasons and all).

Thanks!

22 (edited by g371 2026-01-23 12:13:16)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Easycore wrote:

Is this show just the drama drama, or does it have some aspects of adventure or even action? I see someone mentioned its not as good as the expanse, and I loved expanse, but I don't know if its worth to start watching this now and invest this much time in (5 seasons and all).

Thanks!

Not just drama, drama that sucks. I dropped this abomination in S01.

Not counting a steaming pile of other stuff, in this show is one more hilarious American interpretation of USSR. The show authors managed to portray USSR bs propaganda as the holy grail big_smile

23

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Easycore wrote:

Is this show just the drama drama, or does it have some aspects of adventure or even action? I see someone mentioned its not as good as the expanse, and I loved expanse, but I don't know if its worth to start watching this now and invest this much time in (5 seasons and all).

Thanks!

This is nothing like The Expanse, two widely different genres. Yes there are action elements here too, but its a alternative fantasy take on "what if russians won the space race". Its not a 10/10 more like a 8/10 with some episodes in the 6/10-range, but overall its interesting, engaging and well executed. If you like space stuff, its a must watch.

Don't expect a new Expanse, that show is probably the best scifi series so far in the mid-2010s, its at my all-time top 10.

Oye, Beltalowda!

24 (edited by SgtSaint 2026-01-27 08:32:38)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Abnorm wrote:

Don't expect a new Expanse, that show is probably the best scifi series so far in the mid-2010s, its at my all-time top 10.

Oye, Beltalowda!

aye... Sesa ka.  Bossmang speak truth.

We'll probably never see another Expanse grade show again.  Hollywood isn't geared for making good shows anymore.  Or shows with a story arc.  Everything now is 8-10 episodes every 24-48 months.  And there's no arc: Its 10 episode anthology like Strange New Worlds where its 1 musical, 1 fantasy, 1 comedy and so on.

The days of a Firefly... Battlestar... Babylon 5... The Expanse... are all behind us.  That's why its important to have that all on hard media at home because one day it won't be on any of the streamers, because they don't want it making the current crop of 2037 shows looking bad.

25 (edited by g371 2026-01-27 19:43:31)

Re: For All Mankind [Drama, Sci-Fi]

Abnorm wrote:

a alternative fantasy take on "what if russians won the space race

It glorifies a brutal regime which measured dicks while the population was rationing food. And all that stuff was made with stolen bits and pieces and what a surprise, gulag style labor also was involved. It's American vomit to sell lunatic feminism, which nobody can check, because Americans have a hard time even finding it on the map, but the hilarious reality is that USSR had DEI style stuff before it was cool, but with asterisks that no women had actual power, whole top of the party had a very round number of women. And after that house of cards fell together with an artificial DEI and there were no mandatory quotas, literally in 2 years they naturally dropped 2-3x. So, the authors probably believe that bs that was just for show (like literally everything in USSR) and on that tried to base "the greener grass".

It's 1 cm away from pushing nazi Germany actually was cool.

Asked robot to sum up domestic violence against women USA vs USSR:

In simple terms: women in the USSR generally had it worse.
Domestic violence was widespread in both countries, but in the USSR it was officially denied, rarely punished, and much harder to escape due to housing shortages, lack of shelters, censorship, and heavy alcohol abuse. In the US, abuse was also long ignored, but women had more legal recognition, growing activism, and increasing exit options by the 1970s–80s.

Oops. Если бёт, значит лыбит (tm). Hilarious attempt to try to sell the potential bright future that was lost. Next up Adolf was a pacifist.