Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]
Hmmm, I think you're watching a different Foundation to me, incredible television it ain't.
...how British, you say that about everything, lolz.
You are not logged in. Please login or register. Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi] (Page 7 of 8)Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi] Posts: 151 to 175 of 197Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]graybags wrote:
...how British, you say that about everything, lolz. Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]paisley1 wrote:
Nope! There's at least one programme out there I think is incredible television. I just can't remember what it is right now. 2020. Meh.
Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Kanga wrote:
100% agree. I was very disappointed they didn't follow through. Wonder if it is the same in the book(s), no clue how close the show follows the book(s). My guess is that they dont, and have gender/race swapped a lot. Anyone who knows? 154 2023-09-03 17:22:16 (edited by paisley1 2023-09-05 04:04:07)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]@Moze, Kanga - See spoiler: ▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Moze wrote:
The book(s) are very different from the show although it's the same broad theme and the names/concepts are recycled. To the show's defense, it would be a very weird TV show if they followed the book(s) closely. Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]paisley1 wrote:
▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]graybags wrote:
Wednesday!!!!!!!!!! 158 2023-09-05 03:20:33 (edited by paisley1 2023-09-05 04:12:06)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Kanga wrote:
▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Kanga wrote:
Coming from anyone else, I would have assumed those words to be satirical. But maintaining that kind of control requires you to keep your people both sufficiently uneducated (which had already demonstrably failed by the time Seldon originally showed up) and powerless against you (an advantage that is already lost here due to ignoring the Foundation for a century). The situation they are in this season makes that entirely a case of "what should have been done and why" and no longer of actually actionable advice. ▼Spoiler merc wrote:
General word of advice... trying to retort without at least making a token effort at actually answering the question will usually make anyone come off as defensive and, ultimately, wrong. Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]The 12 Angry Men side-discussion was moved to https://forum.next-episode.net/viewtopic.php?id=11643 (The dates of those posts were changed, the posts were not). Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia 161 2023-09-08 18:15:02 (edited by Kanga 2023-09-08 18:16:10)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]some_one wrote:
Highly educated midwits are usually the ones that are most willing to defend the regime, the reason for that is very simple; They have the most to lose and that's why there is roughly a 100% support for the current regime in academia for instance, the few academic dissidents are usually outside of the ivory towers. Uneducated peasants were the ones that were willing to rebel against the king over something as small as a 2.5% taxhike during feudalism because they were men of principle and they knew by instinct and through religion what was fair and just, that's in contrast to today where e.g. Canada's government is killing off its weaklings through MAID and practically only the Christians or other groups that embrace natural law with very little power are protesting it. some_one wrote:
Well you're certainly right that we're off the rails in regards to the story. You say it's a show about humanity which makes sense because as Salvor Hardin says the Empire is standing against "PROGRESS" and you probably equate that to a form of humanism, an improvement of the human condition. I say it's a shame because the original work was about cyclical history(the alternative theory to "Progress" which is a liberal notion), making it possible to predict social changes through math because we had enough examples of history repeating or rhyming so now we could use math to calculate what would happen similar to how we calculate gravity. What we're presented with instead is a bastardized story full of propaganda sadly. Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]2x9! Wow... I did not see that (episode end) coming. Great acting! Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]lighton wrote:
The show has been taking weirdly sharp turns all season. Never entirely sure where they are going with anything. Really enjoying it. Did this really just happen? Tune in next week to find out. Maybe. ▼Spoiler Kanga wrote:
I think your own biases deceive you here, because I do not. The Empire has proven, here, to be a viable system that has worked reasonably well for thousands of years, with even the Cleons having been around for several centuries. That's not up for debate. But the Empire is collapsing now, slowly, and that will bring with it a loss of technology and infrastructure and, thus, quality of life for a lot of people. The mission is to dampen that effect. Whether or not Seldon is commited to that alone is another question, of course, but that is another matter. The recurring theme that is repeatedly even called out is the contrast between being able to predict the path of humanity as a whole, but not of humans individually. It's about helping humanity as a whole and how it affects the lives of individual humans. My point was about how most of the main characters in the story are leaders or not even strictly human and can directly influence the short-term path of history. Those preachers are not that. They are just regular humans who those events happen to. Having them there helps us viewers to understand the scope of things better. Kanga wrote:
As an autocrat, you'll want to keep people uneducated because you don't want them to know how to overthrow you, or that it is even possible. That rule did not apply when e.g. in Europe the church was a mostly independent institution that kept people "educated" and all it took to take down your local lord was a bunch of torches and pitchforks. This rule has only really started applying when "modern" dictatorships rolled around. The Empire in this show kept itself mostly stable primarily by monopolizing jumpships, but also by claiming ownership over any scientific progress and, most importantly, not getting too involved in most peoples' lives. They failed that last part first when applying collective punishment to an entire planet. Maybe if they had actually killed everyone there it might have worked. But like this, it only lead to large-scale resentment. Then they cut them off from the first part, the jumpships, thus forcing them to come up with their own solution (while assuming they couldn't). The second part was also lost entirely when cutting all communication. Basically, the Cleons underestimated their own replacability. Which is ironic, really, considering how literally replacable they are. Kanga wrote:
Ah please knock it off with this US bullshit. You have white supremacists (incl. Nazis), theocrats, anarcho-capitalists, "conservatives" (those who want to return to how things were), antivaxxers for some reason and a bunch of other authoritans on one side, communists, socialists, anarchists, "conservatives" (those who want to keep things as they are), environmentalists and a bunch of other hippie-related groups on the other. Are you actually trying to claim either of those groups could ever form, much less have any long-term cohesion, outside of a preexisting two-party system? This stuff is ingrained propaganda nonsense, nothing more. And no, that idea of "progress" is not a "liberal notion", it is simply an excuse for people to feel superior to their recent ancestors and it has been around at least since the renaissance. 164 2023-09-10 19:05:20 (edited by paisley1 2023-09-10 19:55:47)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]@Lighton, Some_one - 2x9 - Ya, I never saw that coming either, what a twist ending, what I enjoyed even more was the intro... ▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Season 2 was a whole lot of build up for 8 episodes for 2 pretty badass ending episodes filled with twists and turns. It sets up season 3 well, and I'm looking forward to more! It really, really was slow though for quite a while there. Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]▼Spoiler Damn, they really cleaned up the cast in the season finale... I'm also looking forward to season 3! Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]some_one wrote:
Yes, the monarchists atleast among them, they have a proven trackrecord already so duh. Also I'm not American, I'm from Scandinavia. some_one wrote:
No, Progress as a concept is not from the renaissance, it requires ideas from Kant, Voltaire, Locke, Rousseau etc. Lets just take the industrial revolution as an example requirement because without the ability to make capital investments there is no perceived progress. 168 2023-09-17 00:47:32 (edited by some_one 2023-09-17 00:48:39)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]lighton wrote:
Damn indeed. That finale was... something. Some parts felt a bit rushed or not set up that well, but overall really good, with even more stuff happening that I did not expect. Makes sense to finish many characters' arcs now, because this was always going to have to be a show with massive (i.e. generational) timeskips. Can't bring everyone along all the time, that would defeat the point of being about, well, history. ▼Spoiler Kanga wrote:
Yes, I am aware. But the notions and terminology you are using there are very american. Not surprising, as their nonsense tends to metastasize around the world. Kanga wrote:
How did I forget to name the monarchists/royalists? Anyway, no. The question was whether you actually think those groups, "left" and "right", would ever form naturally like they did in the US or have any common ideology if they didn't have to somehow work around the preexisting di-polar power structure of, well, the US. In countries with more than two notable political parties, it's usually a lot more nuanced than that. And in fact, I think Foundation pretty much manages to completely avoid all of it. Kanga wrote:
Yes, Kant took it to new extremes. But the underlying notion of "we are better than our ancestors" is not a new one. I named the renaissance specifically because it was a time when people (in Europe) started to pretend that, by rediscovering their love for stuff from old Rome and Greece, they were leaving some kind of "dark age" in which nothing new ever happened behind. Except that that wasn't true at all, lots of technological (and other) progress was made in the middle ages, just in a slightly less urbanized context. The renaissance really is the earliest good example I can think of for this kind of temporal elitism. Actually, now that we got there... that's kind of a point against Foundation, which is reusing the old "dark age" term/concept... Ah well. It's entertainment and I am enjoying it. 169 2023-09-17 04:38:22 (edited by paisley1 2023-09-17 04:46:22)Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]2x10 - All of season 2 was great, and in 2x10 stories are being capped and new ones beginning, with plenty of suspense and twists I did not see coming, that said, I watched The Wheel of Time 2x5 right after, and I liked it more. ▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]some_one wrote:
My terminology comes from political philosophy in particular Italian political realism but you can read through these authors and you'll end out with my terminology: Spengler, Burnham, Hobbes, Filmer, Machiavelli, De Maistré, Burke, Carlyle, Evola, De Jourvenel, Pareto, Mosca and last but not least Samuel T. Francis. If you're saying that this is "American", what you're saying is that they are better educated on political philosophy and I strongly reject that idea. some_one wrote:
I don't understand this question, it's always one faction that takes control of a polity, in the US it's often called the "Uniparty". That faction develops two wings and a bunch of sidemovements that are sometimes derivatives of the faction that took power but kept out of power. So if we take Italy in the Renaissance, we'd have a regime of "Christian Imperialists" divided into Guelphs and Ghibellines equivalent to Red vs Blue in the west. That Italian Christian Imperial regime would still spawn e.g. separatists, nationalists, movements against technology(Similar to many Green movements today), movements against degeneracy(similar to the alcohol prohibition, antiporn, prolife etc). There was movements that would call for closer ties to God or allowing artists to depict more of humanity etc. It's how all politics work under all regimes, the only real question in this regard(how regimes work) is which outsiders are banned and the details of WHO is in power. So yes, I believe that. some_one wrote:
Let me just get this right: You think that while they were rediscovering ancient Greece and looking at what was obviously brilliant men even by their standards who they would copy and learn from in many ways, they were thinking "Oh man, if only they knew how much better we are now?" as we do today? That's what you believe? Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Kanga wrote:
Since we are drifting off again, my response to this is in a new thread. paisley1 wrote:
▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]so now its over time for me to watch it Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]some_one wrote:
Interesting question... ▼Spoiler Some shows you might <3 too: https://next-episode.net/messiah https://next-episode.net/devs https://next-episode.net/ted-lasso https://next-episode.net/the-outsider
https://next-episode.net/chernobyl https://next-episode.net/alex-rider https://next-episode.net/the-expanse https://next-episode.net/lovecraft-country https://next-episode.net/into-the-night https://next-episode.net/utopia Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]lighton wrote:
▼Spoiler Re: Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi]Gave this a burl on the strength of comments here. 1st 3 ep's were some sumptuous shit but ep 4 the flashback one where the Rhodesian girl has a giant 60-minute cry on her stupid Waterworld planet was so tedious I may have given up on the while thing now Posts: 151 to 175 of 197Forums - Next Episode → TV Show Discussions → Foundation [Drama, Sci-Fi] |
||||||||