Season 4x1 - If this season cost an eye watering $221 Million, why did they not back the camera the f@#k up and show it? The amount of close ups would suggest they were trying to save money and cut corners, not spend it. Who got the cash?
While the action scenes work well and the story is slightly more Witcher focused, Liam Hemsworth lands a caricature performance of Geralt that's hammed up, comical, and disengaging, and there is far too much screen time needlessly spent on secondary characters that should only serve as window dressing to a Witcher contract.
Like I said before, the story isn't interesting enough to be a serial but works perfect as a procedural, all they have to do to entertain the audience is this simple outline:
1. Geralt gets a contract.
2. Geralt tracks a monster.
3. Geralt plans how to kill a monster. (The bulk of the story)
4. Geralt kills a monster.
5. Geralt gets paid and acquires new equipment, and develops new abilites to use on another monster in the next episode.
6. Geralt hooks up with sorceresses.
7. Repeat for 10 seasons.
8. Make back your $221 million.
The outline above will make money. What they have done, will not.
▼Spoiler
While adding Zoltan and having him discuss weaponry is welcomed and consistent with the story, making Ciri into a helpless lesbian, and Geralt doubting his resolve and future, just doesn't make sense, as Ciri would be instigating it, and Geralt would make some potion and have slept it off in some brothel somewhere, and onto the next contract already. That's The Witcher we want to watch!
Looking forward to The Witcher 4 by CD Projekt RED: The Witcher 4 - Unreal Engine 5 Tech Demo
